Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC): Symptoms, BRCA Risk, Diagnosis and Latest Treatment Advances

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC): Symptoms, BRCA Risk, Diagnosis and Latest Treatment Advances Understanding Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is biologically and clinically different from other forms of breast cancer because it lacks three key biomarkers on the surface of the cancer cells: oestrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, and the HER2 protein, explains Dr Tan, breast surgeon. These biomarkers are important because they allow doctors to classify breast cancer into three broad categories: hormone receptor-positive cancers, HER2-positive cancers, and triple-negative cancers.Each category behaves differently and requires different treatment approaches. Hormone receptor- positive cancers, for example, may respond to hormone-blocking therapies, while HER2-positivecancers can be treated with HER2-targeted drugs. TNBC, however, doesn’t carry these treatment targets, making its management clinically different from many other breast cancer subtypes. Because of this, testing for these biomarkers forms a critical part of breast cancer diagnosis, helping doctors determine the most appropriate treatment strategy for each patient. Why TNBC Can Be More Agressive TNBC is often described as more aggressive because, among the three major categories of breast cancer, it tends to grow more quickly and spread earlier when left untreated. At the same time, TNBC is also considered relatively chemosensitive, meaning many tumours respond fairly well to chemotherapy. This creates a complex clinical picture where some patients may experience a strong initial response to treatment, while others later develop more challenging disease patterns. Although many TNBC tumours can be treated successfully, some unfortunately have a tendency to recur aggressively in other parts of the body, creating greater treatment challenges than other breast cancer subtypes. This can occur even when the tumour initially responds well to treatment. While chemotherapy may eliminate most cancer cells, it may not eradicate every single one. Some surviving cancer cells can gradually develop new mutations that make them more resistant to treatment over time. Eventually, these resistant cells may begin multiplying again and manifest as recurrent disease. This phenomenon isn’t unique to TNBC and can occur across many cancer types. However, TNBC relapses tend to occur earlier, often within the first few years after treatment, compared with hormone receptor-positive breast cancers, where recurrence can sometimes happen many years or even decades later.Signs and Symptoms to Watch For One of the most common early signs of TNBC is a self-detected lump in the breast or underarm, says Dr Tan. The underarm lump may represent an enlarged lymph node. Unlike what many people assume, cancerous breast lumps are often painless, and in TNBC, the lump may increase in size relatively quickly. The absence of pain can sometimes create a false sense of reassurance, causing some women to delay seeking medical attention.TNBC can also be more difficult to detect on routine screening mammograms because it often doesn’t produce the abnormal calcifications commonly seen in other breast cancer subtypes. This means TNBC may occasionally be missed during its earlier stages, particularly in women with dense breast tissue. As a result, a recent normal mammogram shouldn’t discourage women from seeking medical evaluation if they notice a new breast lump or unusual change. When symptoms persist despite a normal mammogram or initial reassurance, further evaluation may still be necessary. A physical examination, along with additional tests such as an ultrasound or breast MRI may be recommended, particularly for younger women with dense breast tissue. If the clinical or imaging findings raise concern for possible malignancy, a breast biopsy may then be required to confirm the diagnosis. Another less common but important presentation is inflammatory breast cancer, which can cause sudden breast swelling, redness, warmth, or mild tenderness that may initially be mistaken for an infection or inflammation. While empirical antibiotics may sometimes be prescribed first, persistent symptoms that don’t improve should be evaluated further by a breast specialist. Dr Tan adds that TNBC also tends to occur more frequently in younger women, including those below the age of 40, which is younger than the typical age at which routine breast cancer screening begins. This makes breast awareness especially important, even among younger women who may not consider themselves at risk. The Role of BRCA and Genetic Testing TNBC is sometimes associated with inherited genetic mutations, particularly BRCA1 and BRCA2, which are among the most common genetic mutations linked to hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. TNBC is especially associated with BRCA1 mutations, particularly when breast cancer develops at a younger age, such as before the age of 50. The presence of a BRCA mutation can influence both surgical decisions and systemic treatment strategies. It may also have important implications for the long-term cancer risk of other family members, making genetic counselling and testing an important consideration in selected patients. Genetic testing is often recommended for women diagnosed with breast cancer under the age of 50, including those with TNBC. It may also be considered in women who develop cancer in both breasts, have a personal history of more than one cancer, or have a strong family history of breast, ovarian, or certain other cancers. A positive BRCA result means that even after successful treatment of the initial breast cancer, there remains an increased risk of developing a new primary cancer in the future due to the underlying inherited genetic predisposition. It can also influence several aspects of long-term management, including: • The use of certain targeted cancer drugs designed for BRCA-associated breast cancers• Surgical planning, where some patients may consider bilateral mastectomy rather than breast- conserving surgery• Long-term surveillance of other high-risk organs, particularly the ovaries • Discussions around preventive surgery, including removal of the ovaries and fallopian tubes in selected patients The implications can also extend to family members, as relatives may potentially carry the same BRCA mutation. When a patient is found to have a BRCA mutation, family members may also be advised to undergo genetic testing. Those who are subsequently found to carry the mutation may include:• Earlier and more intensive cancer surveillance, including breast screening from a younger age using mammograms, ultrasound, and/or breast MRI • Ovarian cancer screening using blood tests and ultrasound • Consideration of preventive surgeries such as risk-reducing double mastectomy or removal of the ovaries and fallopian tubes in appropriate clinical settings Advances in TNBC Treatment One of the major advances in TNBC treatment has been a shift towards using neoadjuvant chemotherapy, where chemotherapy is given before surgery rather than after, notes Dr Tan. This approach allows doctors to assess how well the tumour responds to treatment, which can then help guide and tailor subsequent treatment decisions after surgery.Using chemotherapy upfront may also help shrink the tumour, improving the chances of breast- conserving surgery rather than requiring more extensive surgery. In patients whose TNBC hasspread to the underarm lymph nodes, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can sometimes downstage the cancer sufficiently so that fewer lymph nodes need to be removed during surgery. This represents an important change from previous practice, where routine removal of all underarm lymph nodes was more common and carried a higher long-term risk of complications such as lymphoedema, a chronic swelling condition that can affect the arm. Another important advancement is immunotherapy, which works by targeting immune-related proteins that cancer cells use to evade the body’s immune system. Dr Tan adds that immunotherapy, when combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, has been shown to significantly improve survival outcomes in selected patients with TNBC. Patients with higher-risk TNBC are more likely to be considered for immunotherapy. Factors such as tumour size, lymph node involvement, and other markers suggesting a higher risk of recurrence are often taken into account when determining suitability for these newer treatments. With the addition of immunotherapy, studies have shown improved response rates and better overall survival outcomes in selected patients with TNBC. Several newer drug classes have also shown promising results in clinical trials and are expected to become part of mainstream TNBC treatment over time. Despite the aggressive nature of TNBC, there has been a significant leap in medical treatment over the past decade, leading to improving clinical outcomes for many patients.Expert ContributorDr Tan Yah Yuen Senior Consultant & Breast Surgeon Solis Breast Care & Surgery Centre, Singapore http://www.solis.sg/ http://www.instagram.com/solisbreastcare Article reviewed by Dr Tan Yah YuenOriginally published on Expert-led Health, Fitness & Nutrition Insights. Republished with permission.
Read more

How Cancer Language Shapes Patient Experience and Emotional Well-being

“Keep fighting.” “You’re so strong.” “She lost her battle with breast cancer.”These are phrases many women hear the moment cancer enters their lives.They are usually said with care - words meant to comfort, encourage and give hope. Yet over time, these words do more than describe cancer. They shape how cancer is understood, how people are expected to respond and even how patients see themselves within the experience. The language used to describe cancer – words like “fight”, “battle”, “survivor” and “journey” – can influence how patients experience illness, recovery and identity. While these phrases are often intended to empower, research suggests they may also create emotional pressure, especially for women living with breast cancer or metastatic disease.How ”Battle” Language Shapes the Cancer ExperienceWar and violence metaphors are among the most commonly used ways of describing cancer [1]. Patients are often said to “fight”, “battle” or “defeat” the disease, while cancer is framed as an enemy that must be overcome.At first glance, this language offers clarity. It gives structure to something deeply uncertain. In some cases, it has been shown to help patients feel a sense of agency and control during treatment [1]. For some patients, it offers a way to make sense of an experience that feels otherwise overwhelming. However, research shows that this framing also carries unintended weight. When cancer is framed as a fight, it may unintentionally suggest that recovery is linked not only to medicine, but also to mindset, positivity or personal strength [2] [3].This can leave some women feeling pressured to stay hopeful all the time, even during moments of fear, grief or exhaustion [3]. Over time, this may make it more difficult to express more complex or fluctuating emotions. One study involving women with metastatic breast cancer found that some participants disliked phrases such as “lost the battle”, because it implied that people who had passed had somehow not fought hard enough [2] [3]. In reality, cancer progression is shaped by complex biological factors, not personal failure.The Emotional Complexity of Cancer SurvivorshipThe language used to frame the cancer experience is often rooted in positive intent. Yet it can sometimes oversimplify the realities of what each person goes through.The word “survivor” is widely used in cancer care and advocacy, often as a symbol of strength and endurance. Public narratives around cancer survivorship frequently position it as a conclusion - a final stage where one crosses the finish line, where the story is expected to end. For some women, this is meaningful and affirming, like reaching light at the end of a long tunnel.Others may feel differently.Some women embrace the “survivor” label immediately after treatment but feel less connected to it over time [4]. Others may not relate to it at all, because it continually reminds them of what they have been through. For many women, life after breast cancer is not a clear “after”, but an ongoing process of adjusting - to a changed body, lingering side effects, uncertainty and to a new sense of normal [5]. For those living with metastatic breast cancer, the language of “survivorship” can feel even more distant [2]. Rather than a finish line, cancer remains part of ongoing life. In this context, words that imply closure or completion may not fully reflect lived reality and can make empowering words like “survivor” feel alien. Why Cancer Patients Experience Language DifferentlyBeyond “fighter” or “survivor”, gentler language such as “journey” may also not be universally experienced in the same way.Journey metaphors are used to soften the intensity of cancer language. They suggest movement, progress and continuity rather than a battle to be won. In some cases, this can help patients make sense of a long and uncertain process by encouraging them to take things one step at a time [6].However, research shows that the idea of a “journey” can sometimes feel too linear, or even overly positive, especially when a patient’s experience involves ongoing treatment, setbacks or disruption to daily life [7]. Others may feel they did not choose the journey they are on, making the metaphor feel distant from reality. What feels empowering to one person may feel exhausting, alienating or inaccurate to another, and that difference matters. Patient-Centred Communication in Cancer CareCancer language becomes most meaningful when it allows room for individual interpretation, rather than assigning a fixed identity or expectation. What many women consistently express is not a rejection of hope or strength, but a need for language that does not add pressure to an already complex experience. For some, what matters more is simply being understood without needing to perform strength, optimism or resilience all the time. Because for many people, living with cancer is not about fitting neatly into a narrative of victory or endurance. It is about gently navigating an experience that is deeply personal, often unpredictable and still unfolding in different ways over time.And sometimes, the most compassionate language is the kind that leaves space for that complexity to exist. Finding Support in Your Own WaySometimes, reassurance begins with a conversation. Whether you are navigating a new diagnosis, seeking a second opinion or trying to make sense of your breast cancer experience, having the right support can make a difference.At Solis Breast Care & Surgery Centre, our breast specialists provide compassionate and personalised breast care in Singapore - at your own pace, and on your own terms.References[1] Liu, Y., Semino, E., Rietjens, J. & Payne, S. (2024). Cancer experience in metaphors: patients, carers, professionals, students - a scoping review. BMJ supportive & palliative care, 14(e3), e2366–e2376. https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2024-004927 [2] Hulse, S. B., Balogun, Z., Rosenzweig, M. Q., Marsland, A. L., & Palmer, V. M. (2024). I'm still me, I'm still a person: war metaphor use and meaning making in women with metastatic breast cancer. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 32(2), 108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08309-5 [3] Prado, G. F., & Gonçalves, T. A. (2025). Why we should rethink military metaphors in cancer. Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia, 51(2), e20250109. https://doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20250109 [4] Tsiakiri, A., Tzanas, K., Chrisostomidou, D., Plakias, S., Christidi, F., Frantzidis, C., Aggelousis, N., Lavdaniti, M., & Bista, E. (2026). Person-First or Disease-First? Language Choices in Cancer Communication. Nursing Reports, 16(4), 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep16040143 [5] Guité-Verret, A., & Vachon, M. (2024). The Traces of Cancer: A Metaphorical Understanding of the Experiences of Women Living Beyond Breast Cancer. Qualitative Health Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241242054 [6] Semino, E., Demjén, Z., Demmen, J., Koller, V., Payne, S., Hardie, A., & Rayson, P. (2015). The online use of Violence and Journey metaphors by patients with cancer, as compared with health professionals: a mixed methods study. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 7(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000785 [7] Appleton, L., & Flynn, M. (2014). Searching for the new normal: Exploring the role of language and metaphors in becoming a cancer survivor. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 18(4), 378–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2014.03.012 
Read more